Complete Yocto mirror with license table for TQMa6UL (2038-compliance)

- 264 license table entries with exact download URLs (224/264 resolved)
- Complete sources/ directory with all BitBake recipes
- Build configuration: tqma6ul-multi-mba6ulx, spaetzle (musl)
- Full traceability for Softwarefreigabeantrag
- GCC 13.4.0, Linux 6.6.102, U-Boot 2023.04, musl 1.2.4
- License distribution: GPL-2.0 (24), MIT (23), GPL-2.0+ (18), BSD-3 (16)

sources/poky/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py

@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+#
+# Copyright OpenEmbedded Contributors
+#
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
+#
+
+from oeqa.selftest.case import OESelftestTestCase
+
+import oe.recipeutils
+
+class Distrodata(OESelftestTestCase):
+
+    def test_checkpkg(self):
+        """
+        Summary:     Test that upstream version checks do not regress
+        Expected:    Upstream version checks should succeed except for the recipes listed in the exception list.
+        Product:     oe-core
+        Author:      Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
+        """
+        feature = 'LICENSE_FLAGS_ACCEPTED += " commercial"\n'
+        self.write_config(feature)
+
+        pkgs = oe.recipeutils.get_recipe_upgrade_status()
+
+        regressed_failures = [pkg[0] for pkg in pkgs if pkg[1] == 'UNKNOWN_BROKEN']
+        regressed_successes = [pkg[0] for pkg in pkgs if pkg[1] == 'KNOWN_BROKEN']
+        msg = ""
+        if len(regressed_failures) > 0:
+            msg = msg + """
+The following packages failed upstream version checks. Please fix them using UPSTREAM_CHECK_URI/UPSTREAM_CHECK_REGEX
+(when using tarballs) or UPSTREAM_CHECK_GITTAGREGEX (when using git). If an upstream version check cannot be performed
+(for example, if upstream does not use git tags), you can set UPSTREAM_VERSION_UNKNOWN to '1' in the recipe to acknowledge
+that the check cannot be performed.
+""" + "\n".join(regressed_failures)
+        if len(regressed_successes) > 0:
+            msg = msg + """
+The following packages have been checked successfully for upstream versions,
+but their recipes claim otherwise by setting UPSTREAM_VERSION_UNKNOWN. Please remove that line from the recipes.
+""" + "\n".join(regressed_successes)
+        self.assertTrue(len(regressed_failures) == 0 and len(regressed_successes) == 0, msg)
+
+    def test_maintainers(self):
+        """
+        Summary:     Test that oe-core recipes have a maintainer and entries in maintainers list have a recipe
+        Expected:    All oe-core recipes (except a few special static/testing ones) should have a maintainer listed in maintainers.inc file.
+        Expected:    All entries in maintainers list should have a recipe file that matches them
+        Product:     oe-core
+        Author:      Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
+        """
+        def is_exception(pkg):
+            exceptions = ["packagegroup-",]
+            for i in exceptions:
+                 if i in pkg:
+                     return True
+            return False
+
+        def is_maintainer_exception(entry):
+            exceptions = ["musl", "newlib", "linux-yocto", "linux-dummy", "mesa-gl", "libgfortran", "libx11-compose-data",
+                          "cve-update-nvd2-native",]
+            for i in exceptions:
+                 if i in entry:
+                     return True
+            return False
+
+        feature = 'require conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc\nLICENSE_FLAGS_ACCEPTED += " commercial"\nPARSE_ALL_RECIPES = "1"\nPACKAGE_CLASSES = "package_ipk package_deb package_rpm"\n'
+        self.write_config(feature)
+
+        with bb.tinfoil.Tinfoil() as tinfoil:
+            tinfoil.prepare(config_only=False)
+
+            with_maintainer_list = []
+            no_maintainer_list = []
+
+            missing_recipes = []
+            recipes = []
+            prefix = "RECIPE_MAINTAINER:pn-"
+
+            # We could have used all_recipes() here, but this method will find
+            # every recipe if we ever move to setting RECIPE_MAINTAINER in recipe files
+            # instead of maintainers.inc
+            for fn in tinfoil.all_recipe_files(variants=False):
+                if not '/meta/recipes-' in fn:
+                    # We are only interested in OE-Core
+                    continue
+                rd = tinfoil.parse_recipe_file(fn, appends=False)
+                pn = rd.getVar('PN')
+                recipes.append(pn)
+                if is_exception(pn):
+                    continue
+                if rd.getVar('RECIPE_MAINTAINER'):
+                    with_maintainer_list.append((pn, fn))
+                else:
+                    no_maintainer_list.append((pn, fn))
+
+            maintainers = tinfoil.config_data.keys()
+            for key in maintainers:
+                 if key.startswith(prefix):
+                     recipe = tinfoil.config_data.expand(key[len(prefix):])
+                     if is_maintainer_exception(recipe):
+                         continue
+                     if recipe not in recipes:
+                         missing_recipes.append(recipe)
+
+        if no_maintainer_list:
+            self.fail("""
+The following recipes do not have a maintainer assigned to them. Please add an entry to meta/conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc file.
+""" + "\n".join(['%s (%s)' % i for i in no_maintainer_list]))
+
+        if not with_maintainer_list:
+            self.fail("""
+The list of oe-core recipes with maintainers is empty. This may indicate that the test has regressed and needs fixing.
+""")
+
+        if missing_recipes:
+                self.fail("""
+Unable to find recipes for the following entries in maintainers.inc:
+""" + "\n".join(['%s' % i for i in missing_recipes]))